The Accessibility Solution for D2L Brightspace
Find and document accessibility issues in D2L Brightspace course materials, instructor uploads, content modules, DOCX files, PDFs, and LMS review workflows.
Accessibility review inside the LMS content lifecycle
D2L course files are often uploaded after documents have already been created elsewhere. Inkable helps teams review those materials where they become student-facing content.
What Inkable checks
- Course document structure and heading hierarchy
- Alt text gaps in uploaded instructional files
- Tables, lists, links, and readable document organization
- PDF accessibility barriers before students encounter them
Evidence for reviewers
- Course-material issue summaries
- Reviewer-friendly remediation notes
- Status reporting for accessibility programs
- Evidence aligned to WCAG, Section 508, and PDF/UA
Where it fits
A workflow for real document handoffs
Instructional designers and faculty upload syllabi, readings, handouts, presentations, PDFs, and DOCX files into Brightspace content modules.
Accessibility teams need a way to identify document barriers at the course-material layer, not only at the LMS platform layer.
Program owners need evidence that student-facing course files were reviewed before or after publication.
Common issues
The barriers reviewers need to find
Uploaded readings and handouts with missing headings, untagged PDFs, inaccessible tables, or image-only pages.
Course documents with missing alt text, repeated vague links, and poor document navigation for screen-reader users.
Files copied across terms that carry forward older accessibility barriers without a clear review record.
Frequently asked questions
Everything you need to know about how Inkable checks, fixes, and documents accessibility across authoring tools, LMS course materials, and PDF workflows. Need more help? Reach out to support@inkabledocs.com.